On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 10:09:12AM -0700, Remco Treffkorn wrote: > Semantics. Prom-libc sits on top of a layer that implements vfs that sits on > top of the prom. None of libc has to be aware of the vfs stuff. This is a right, as far as everything in libc knows its just unix syscalls. the only time anyone would know is by looking at open.c and seeing it doing more then just syscall(sys_open); > What is there makes a test program compile. It does not make it correct. Give > me a few more days to finish it. ok > My compiler comes with YellowDog Linux 3.0. i know who is behind it, they are really just glorified rpm --rebuild monkeys. the CEO is a MacOS9 user. > I am not in the habit of compiling gcc myself. I operate under the ssumption, > that if a major distribution (terra soft loves to hear that) is broken, they > just created a new standard. Many people are using this buggy compiler. You > can either accommodate them, or be innundated by e-mails complainig about > your package being broken. And I know you will love this. ill tell them get a better compiler, if it is indeed a broken compiler. i won't kludge to accomidate brokeness. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgp00023.pgp
Description: PGP signature