On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 08:16:52PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > ok, so the above patch looks sane to you then?
>
> No, it looks like chineese to me :) I was only answering about the
> specifics of the disk@0 node in there
echo "${DEVICE_PATH##*device-tree}/k2-sata@$DEVICE_ID/disk@0:$PARTITION"
the first part of this just strips off /proc/device-tree/
$DEVICE_ID comes from the Id: listed in /proc/scsi/scsi
for for something like this:
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
Vendor: MICROP Model: 4421-07 0124SJ Rev: 24SJ
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
DEVICE_ID=1
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgp00004.pgp
Description: PGP signature